Anatomical distribution and expression of <scp>CYP</scp> in humans: Neuropharmacological implications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cytochrome P450 (CYP450) superfamily is responsible for the metabolism of most xenobiotics and pharmacological treatments generally used in clinical settings. Genetic factors as well as environmental determinants acting through fine epigenetic mechanisms modulate the expression of CYP over the lifespan (fetal vs. infancy vs. adult phases) and in diverse organs. In addition, pathological processes might alter the expression of CYP. In this selective review, we sought to summarize the evidence on the expression of CYP focusing on three specific aspects: (a) the anatomical distribution of the expression in body districts relevant in terms of drug pharmacokinetics (liver, gut, and kidney) and pharmacodynamics, focusing for the latter on the brain, since this is the target organ of psychopharmacological agents; (b) the patterns of expression during developmental phases; and (c) the expression of CYP450 enzymes during pathological processes such as cancer. We showed that CYP isoforms show distinct patterns of expression depending on the body district and the specific developmental phases. Of particular relevance for neuropsychopharmacology is the complex regulatory mechanisms that significantly modulate the complexity of the pharmacokinetic regulation, including the concentration of specific CYP isoforms in distinct areas of the brain, where they could greatly affect local substrate and metabolite concentrations of drugs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it