A Cognitive and Machine Learning-Based Software Development Paradigm Supported by Context
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advances in the use of cognitive and machine learning (ML) enabled systems fuel the quest for novel approaches and tools to support software developers in executing their tasks. First, as software development is a complex and dynamic activity, these tasks are highly dependent on the characteristics of the software project and its context, and developers need comprehensive support in terms of information and guidance based on the task context. Second, there is a lack of methods based on conversational-guided agents that consider cognitive aspects such as paying attention and remembering. Third, there is also a lack of techniques that make use of historical implicit or tacit data to infer new knowledge about the project tasks such as related tasks, task experts, relevant information needed for task completion and warnings, and navigation aspects of the process such as what tasks to perform next and optimal task sequencing. Based on these challenges, this paper introduces a novel paradigm for human-machine software support based on context, cognitive assistance, and machine learning, and briefly describes ongoing research activities to realize this paradigm. The research takes advantage of the synergy among emergent methods provided in context-aware software processes, cognitive computing such as chatbots, and machine learning such as recommendation systems. These novel paradigms have the potential to transform the way software development currently occurs by allowing developers to receive valuable information and guidance in real-time while they are participating in projects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".