MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3128045404 · doi:10.3138/ctr.185.007

Drag on Pointe: Dancer, Television Sensation, and Drag Superstar Brooke Lynn Hytes Is Queering Ballet

2021· article· en· W3128045404 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Russ Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalletDanceDragMasculinityArtClassical balletVisual artsGender studiesSociologyPhysicsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Before her star-making turn on RuPaul’s Drag Race, Canadian drag artist Brooke Lynn Hytes an was accomplished ballet dancer. The performer, born Brock Hayhoe, trained at Canada’s National Ballet School and danced professionally with both the Cape Town City Ballet and the esteemed drag dance troupe Les Ballets Trockadero de Monte Carlo. This article explores how Hytes has transported ballet’s deep repertoire of feminine signifiers onto drag stages, including Drag Race and the drag pageant Miss Continental. In doing so, Hytes has furthered the hallmark of Les Ballets Trockadero de Monte Carlo—queering ballet. In particular, Hytes has queered the practice of pointe work, a technique traditionally reserved for woman ballet dancers that functions as one of ballet’s most potent feminine signifiers. By incorporating pointe work into her drag dance, Hytes has revealed the practice to be a fiction of femininity, not unlike the drag queen’s make-up and wig. This article additionally charts Hytes’s pre- Drag Race career, her success since appearing on the show, and her contribution to drag culture in Canada. In a Q&A with Canadian Theatre Review accompanying the piece, Hytes speaks about fusing drag and ballet, her early experiences in the Toronto drag scene, and her hopes for the forthcoming Canadian edition of Drag Race, Canada’s Drag Race.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicDiversity and Impact of DanceFrench-language works237,207