MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Influence of polymorphisms in the vascular endothelial growth factor gene on allograft rejection after kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis

2021· preprint· en· W3128060044 on OpenAlexaff
Thanee Eiamsitrakoon, Phuntila Tharabenjasin, Noel Pabalan, Hamdi Jarjanazi, Adis Tasanarong

Bibliographic record

VenueF1000Research · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMinistry of EnvironmentMinistry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotypeBonferroni correctionAlleleTransplantationMedicineInternal medicineKidney transplantationMeta-analysisGastroenterologyOncologyBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Background:</ns3:bold> Reported associations of allograft rejection in kidney transplant patients with <ns3:italic>VEGF</ns3:italic> single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been inconsistent between studies, which prompted a meta-analysis to obtain more precise estimates. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Methods:</ns3:bold> <ns3:italic/> Using the PICO elements, kidney transplant patients (P) were compared by genotype data between rejectors (I) and non-rejectors (C) in order to determine the risk of allograft rejection (O) attributed to the <ns3:italic>VEGF</ns3:italic> SNPs. Literature search of four databases yielded seven articles. To calculate risks for allograft rejection, four SNPs were examined. Using the allele-genotype model we compared the variant ( <ns3:italic>var</ns3:italic> ) with the wild-type ( <ns3:italic>wt</ns3:italic> ) and heterozygous ( <ns3:italic>var</ns3:italic> - <ns3:italic>wt</ns3:italic> ) alleles. Meta-analysis treatments included outlier and subgroup analyses, the latter was based on ethnicity (Indians/Caucasians) and rejection type (acute/chronic). Multiple comparisons were corrected with the Bonferroni test. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Results:</ns3:bold> Five highly significant outcomes (P <ns3:sup>a</ns3:sup> &lt; 0.01) survived Bonferroni correction, one of which showed reduced risk for the <ns3:italic>var</ns3:italic> allele (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.82). The remaining four indicated increased risk for the <ns3:italic>wt</ns3:italic> allele where the chronic rejection (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.36-3.24) and Indian (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.13-1.84) subgroups were accorded susceptibility status. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Conclusions:</ns3:bold> Risk associations for renal allograft rejection were increased and reduced on account of the <ns3:italic>wt</ns3:italic> and <ns3:italic>var</ns3:italic> alleles, respectively. These findings could render the <ns3:italic>VEGF</ns3:italic> polymorphisms useful in the clinical genetics of kidney transplantation. </ns3:p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueF1000ResearchSame topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207