MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3128216597 · doi:10.1021/cen-09904-polcon1

US to join HFC treaty

2021· article· en· W3128216597 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
CHERYL HOGUE

Bibliographic record

VenueC&EN Global Enterprise · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicKorean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoin (topology)TreatyPolitical scienceBusinessComputer scienceComputer securityLawMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

US president Joe Biden’s recent executive order on climate change includes provisions impacting a class of commercial chemicals and, likely, chemical plants. Biden called for the US to officially join a key environmental treaty controlling a class of synthetic greenhouse gases. The pact ramps down the production and use of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), which are used as refrigerants, solvents, and etching agents in silicon chip manufacturing. HFCs replaced two types of chemicals that erode stratospheric ozone—chlorofluorocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons. While HFCs don’t harm the ozone layer, they are potent greenhouse gases. The HFC treaty, reached in 2016 in Rwanda’s capital city, is the Kigali Amendment to the 1989 Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer. The US signed the Kigali deal but is not yet an official treaty partner. For that to happen, the Senate must give its advice and consent. Biden directed Secretary of State Antony Blinken to formally

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0170.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0830.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueC&EN Global EnterpriseSame topicKorean Peninsula Historical and Political StudiesFrench-language works237,207