Inferring translational heterogeneity from <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> ribosome profiling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Translation of mRNAs into proteins by the ribosome is the most important step of protein biosynthesis. Accordingly, translation is tightly controlled and heavily regulated to maintain cellular homeostasis. Ribosome profiling (Ribo-seq) has revolutionized the study of translation by revealing many of its underlying mechanisms. However, equally many aspects of translation remain mysterious, in part also due to persisting challenges in the interpretation of data obtained from Ribo-seq experiments. Here, we show that some of the variability observed in Ribo-seq data has biological origins and reflects programmed heterogeneity of translation. Through a comparative analysis of Ribo-seq data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we systematically identify short 3-codon sequences that are differentially translated (DT) across mRNAs, that is, identical sequences that are translated sometimes fast and sometimes slowly beyond what can be attributed to variability between experiments. Remarkably, the thus identified DT sequences link to mechanisms known to regulate translation elongation and are enriched in genes important for protein and organelle biosynthesis. Our results thus highlight examples of translational heterogeneity that are encoded in the genomic sequences and tuned to optimizing cellular homeostasis. More generally, our work highlights the power of Ribo-seq to understand the complexities of translation regulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".