A Molecular Analysis Of Prion Protein Expression In Alzheimer's Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Prion Diseases, misfolding of neuronal prion protein (PrPC) to a pathogenic isomer (PrPSC) is associated with neuronal death. Previous pathological studies have demonstrated increased immunoreactivity of PrPC at Aβ plaques in Alzheimer's Disease, and it has been suggested that this either reflects a role for PrPC in the neuronal response to stress or is a feature of the neuropathogenesis of atypical subtypes of Alzheimer's disease. In this paper we utilised western blotting to examine the molecular characteristics of PrP in frozen Hippocampal tissue from 7 cases of Alzheimer's Disease in which prion protein expression was demonstrated by immunohistochemistry, before using Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) methodology to define the genotype of the codon 129 polymorphism of PRNP in each case. We observed PrP accumulating as globular structures at A plaques, and within ependymal cells lining the lateral ventricle. Immunohistochemistry also showed that PrPC and Superoxide dismutase-1 where deposited in a similar pattern at Aβ plaques. Western blotting revealed that PrP in Alzheimer's disease is composed of the same 208-residue peptide expressed in non-diseased brain. Quantitative western blot analysis demonstrated increased levels of PrPC in a short duration case of Alzheimer's Disease, while, in the remaining cases, levels of PrPC decreased in parallel with increasing disease duration and decreasing brain mass. RFLP genotyping revealed that all codon 129 genotypes (M/M, M/V, V/V) were represented in our study cohort. Our data suggest that increased levels of PrPC may account for PrP immunoreactivity at plaques in Alzheimer's disease, and that PrP deposition is not restricted to certain atypical subtypes of Alzheimer's disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".