Fornas alternativas de propriedade: cooperativismo, produção capitalista do espaço urbano e mercado imobiliário
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente texto busca questionar as formas capitalistas de produção da cidade, sobretudo quanto a apropriação individual de valor produzido coletivamente através da propriedade privada. Analisam-se formas virtuosas de propriedade coletiva de habitação. Com base em estudos prévios e revisões bibliográficas elencam-se como potenciais casos de análise as cooperativas de habitação Dinamarquesas e Canadenses. O valor aportado por estes dois casos ilustra como a gestão coletiva da habitaçãos e relaciona com a qualidade de moradia e sociabilidade urbana, concluindo num acesso à cidade mais democrático. Também se enfatiza como o Estado enquanto formulador de normativas e instrumentos jurídicos que gerem o solo urbano não é um agente neutro nos processos de exclusão sócio espacial decorrentes da produção capitalista do espaço urbano. Contudo, a coletivização da gestão do solo urbano, através de grupos da sociedade civil organizada, apoiadas por instrumentos legais desenvolvidos pelo Estado pode permitir uma cidade mais democrática. This text seeks to question the capitalist forms of production in the city, especially as regards the individual appropriation of value produced collectively through private property. It analyses virtuous forms of collective housing ownership. Based on previous studies and literature reviews, Danish and Canadian housing cooperatives are listed as potential cases of analysis. The value provided by these two cases illustrates how collective housing management relates to quality of housing and urban sociability, concluding in a more democratic access to the city. It also emphasizes how the State as a formulator of norms and legal instruments that manage urban land is not a neutral agent in the processes of social-spatial exclusion resulting from the capitalist production of urban space. However, the collectivisation of urban land management through organised civil society groups, supported by legal instruments developed by the State, may enable a more democratic city.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".