MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3128830300 · doi:10.5539/jas.v13n3p17

Morpho-agronomic Characters Under Drought Stress and Genetic Diversity on the Local Landraces of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] From East Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia

2021· article· en· W3128830300 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dwi Setyo Rini, Anni Nuraisyah

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural pest management studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersToray Science FoundationLembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan IndonesiaIndonesia Toray Science Foundation
KeywordsUPGMAVignaBiologyGenetic diversityDrought stressHorticultureMorphoGenotypeAgronomyBotanyVeterinary medicinePopulationGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was performed to reveal the morpho-agronomic characters under drought and genetic diversity using SRAP (Sequence-related amplified polymorphism) marker on local landraces of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L). Walp) collected from East Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia. Data on drought response indexes according to the dry matter production of cowpea plants classified Carolina and Pinu Pahar as drought-sensitive and drought-tolerant cowpea genotypes, respectively. The assessment of the genetic diversity of cowpea genotypes was performed by using 25 SRAP combination primers. A total of 250 bands were produced by which 245 bands (98%) were polymorphic. The value of PIC (Polymorphic Information Content) of SRAP primers in this study varied from the highest value (0.97) to the lowest value (0.71) generated by primer pairs Me4-Em1 and Me3-Em4, respectively, with an average of PIC 0.87. An unweighted pair group method based on arithmetic averages (UPGMA) in this study was performed according to Nei and Li’s similarity index. The analysis of UPGMA and PCoA successfully separated Carolina and Pinu Pahar genotypes into different clusters. The result of the Mantel test showed that there was no significant correlation between the independent morpho-agronomic analysis and SRAP molecular matrix data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.641

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicAgricultural pest management studiesFrench-language works237,207