Congenital central hypoventilation syndrome and ventilatory responses during cardiopulmonary exercise testing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Previous studies have shown evidence of hypoxemia and hypercapnia during cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) evaluation in children with congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (CCHS). However, there are no longitudinal studies which compared CPET findings to polysomnogram (PSG) or PHOX2B mutation, to date. Objectives To describe the longitudinal CPET findings in a cohort of children with CCHS and correlate the findings to the PSG results. Methods This retrospective study was conducted in children with CCHS followed in the Long‐term Ventilation Program at SickKids, Toronto, Canada between September, 2013 and January, 2020. CCHS genetic mutation, age of diagnosis, ventilatory support, family history, disease associations of CCHS, CPETs, and PSG parameters were recorded and analyzed. Results A total of nine patients with CCHS (46 CPETs and 46 PSGs) were enrolled. Four (44.4%) children had polyalanine repeat mutations. The mean ( SD ) age at the time of diagnosis and duration of ventilatory usage were 3.2 ± 3.4 years and 11.5 ± 2.8 years, respectively. All abnormal CPETs had hypercapnia in at least 1 phase of the exercise test. Hypercapnia (12/46; 26.1%) at peak of exercise was the most common abnormality. None of the children experienced an oxygen desaturation below 90%. End‐tidal CO 2 (PetCO 2 ) at rest and at peak exercise in the CPETs were significantly correlated with PSG TcCO 2 while PetCO 2 at anaerobic threshold was correlated with CO 2 in pre‐PSG capillary blood gas. Conclusion Nocturnal hypoventilation may impact the CPET results in CCHS children. Serial CPETs should be considered standard clinical care for all CCHS children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".