Bentonite swelling characteristics with a hypersaline multi-component pore fluid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Swelling characteristics of compacted bentonite when hydrated with a hypersaline pore fluid (332 g/L total dissolved solids; 6.6 mol/L ionic strength) are reported. The pore fluid mimics the multiple constituents and their concentrations found for the Cobourg limestone of the Michigan Basin and is dominated by sodium (25% mole fraction) with some potassium, calcium, and magnesium (10%, 5%, and 4% mole fractions). Measurements of swell pressure for two sodium bentonites when hydrated under conditions of zero volume increase are reported. Swell pressure reached a peak within 10–30 h from the onset of hydration, followed by a continual decrease over 1 year of testing from chemical interaction between the bentonite and pore fluid. After 1 year, the swell pressure of the MX-80 bentonite tested decreased by a factor of nine relative to the peak swell pressure with deionized water when the dry density was 1.6 Mg/m3. Swell pressures increased as dry density increased. However, chemical interactions appear to have more influence on swell pressure than density for the pore fluid examined as a swell pressure of just under 1200 kPa was measured for MX-80 after 1.8 years of hydration when compacted to the highest dry density of 1.8 Mg/m3 examined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".