MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129167431 · doi:10.1090/mcom/3665

Counting zeros of Dedekind zeta functions

2021· preprint· lv· W3129167431 on OpenAlexafffund
Elchin Hasanalizade, Quanli Shen, Peng‐Jie Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics of Computation · 2021
Typepreprint
Languagelv
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic Number Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDedekind cutMathematicsCombinatoricsMultiplicity (mathematics)DiscriminantDirichlet distributionAlgebraic number fieldDegree (music)Function (biology)PhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a number field <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper K"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">K</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> of degree <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="n Subscript upper K"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">n_K</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> and with absolute discriminant <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="d Subscript upper K"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">d_K</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> , we obtain an explicit bound for the number <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper N Subscript upper K Baseline left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">N_K(T)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> of non-trivial zeros (counted with multiplicity), with height at most <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper T"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">T</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> , of the Dedekind zeta function <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="zeta Subscript upper K Baseline left-parenthesis s right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi> ζ </mml:mi> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\zeta _K(s)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper K"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">K</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> . More precisely, we show that for <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper T greater-than-or-equal-to 1"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo> ≥ </mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">T \geq 1</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> , <disp-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="StartAbsoluteValue upper N Subscript upper K Baseline left-parenthesis upper T right-parenthesis minus StartFraction upper T Over pi EndFraction log left-parenthesis d Subscript upper K Baseline left-parenthesis StartFraction upper T Over 2 pi e EndFraction right-parenthesis Superscript n Super Subscript upper K Superscript Baseline right-parenthesis EndAbsoluteValue less-than-or-equal-to 0.228 left-parenthesis log d Subscript upper K Baseline plus n Subscript upper K Baseline log upper T right-parenthesis plus 23.108 n Subscript upper K Baseline plus 4.520 comma"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo maxsize="1.623em" minsize="1.623em">|</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mstyle> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo> − </mml:mo> <mml:mfrac> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mi> π </mml:mi> </mml:mfrac> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mo> ⁡ </mml:mo> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo maxsize="1.623em" minsize="1.623em">(</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mstyle> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo maxsize="1.623em" minsize="1.623em">(</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mstyle> <mml:mfrac> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mi> π </mml:mi> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mfrac> <mml:msup> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo maxsize="1.623em" minsize="1.623em">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mstyle> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo maxsize="1.623em" minsize="1.623em">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mstyle> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD">

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics of ComputationSame topicAnalytic Number Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207