Origins and chromosome differentiation of <i>Thinopyrum elongatum</i> revealed by <i>PepC</i> and <i>Pgk1</i> genes and ND-FISH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thinopyrum elongatum is an important gene pool for wheat genetic improvement. However, the origins of the Thinopyrum genomes and the nature of the genus’ intraspecific relationships are still controversial. In this study, we used single-copy nuclear genes and non-denaturing fluorescence in situ hybridization (ND-FISH) to characterize genome constitution and chromosome differentiation in Th. elongatum. According to phylogenetic analyses based on PepC and Pgk1 genes, there was an E genome with three versions (E e , E b , E x ) and St genomes in the polyploid Th. elongatum. The ND-FISH results of pSc119.2 and pAs1 revealed that the karyotypes of diploid Th. elongatum and Th. bessarabicum were different, and the chromosome differentiation occurred among accessions of the diploid Th. elongatum. In addition, the tetraploid Th. elongatum has two groups of ND-FISH karyotype, indicating that the tetraploid Th. elongatum might be a segmental allotetraploid. In summary, our results suggested that the diploid Th. elongatum, Th. Bessarabicum, and Pseudoroegneria were the donors of the E e , E b , and St genomes to the polyploid Th. elongatum, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".