MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129223289 · doi:10.37628/ijra.v6i2.1171

A Study on Multitasking Robot for Military Services

2020· article· en· W3129223289 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ulka P. Ghosalkar, Chetana T. Baviskar, Shweta D. Gaware, Shraddha G. Panchal

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robotics and Automation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT-based Smart Home Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBluetoothAndroid (operating system)RobotHuman multitaskingEmbedded systemComputer sciencePhoneComputer securityWirelessHuman–computer interactionReal-time computingOperating systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are multiple types of robot that are used in security, spying and other applications .A virtual artificial agent or electro-mechanical machine which can be guided through a program or electronic circuitry is called as ROBOT. In case for security, spying i.e. raw agency and other some areas involve a great risk and hence those tasks must be performed by robots. The proposed intelligent robot with camera and other special functions can be operated remotely for monitoring and controlling purpose. Android will be used as advance remote controller for the robot which will be connected through Bluetooth with android phone. The Android provide access to wide range of libraries that can be used to build rich applications and also includes full set of tools that provides high productivity and deep insight for the applications. The Wi-Fi and Bluetooth are open standard specification technology for radio frequency which is directly based on short range connectivity that helps in wireless communication. The data which will be received through Bluetooth in android smart phone is given as input to controller and hence controller will act accordingly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Robotics and AutomationSame topicIoT-based Smart Home SystemsFrench-language works237,207