MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129281488 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2022.3182899

Resource Reservation in Backhaul and Radio Access Network With Uncertain User Demands

2022· article· en· W3129281488 on OpenAlexaff
Navid Reyhanian, Hamid Farmanbar, Zhi‐Quan Luo

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBackhaul (telecommunications)Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditionsComputer scienceReservationComputer networkRadio access networkMathematical optimizationScalabilityDistributed computingOptimization problemWirelessWireless networkBase stationAlgorithmMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resource reservation is an essential step to enable wireless data networks to support a wide range of user demands. In this paper, we consider the problem of joint resource reservation in the backhaul and Radio Access Network (RAN) based on the statistics of user demands and channel states, and also network availability. The goal is to maximize the sum of expected traffic flow rates, subject to link and access point budget constraints, while minimizing the expected outage of downlinks. The formulated problem turns out to be non-convex and difficult to solve to global optimality. We propose an efficient Block Coordinate Descent (BCD) algorithm to approximately solve the problem. The proposed BCD algorithm optimizes the link capacity reservation in the backhaul using a novel multi-path routing algorithm that decomposes the problem down to link-level and parallelizes the computation across backhaul links, while the reservation of transmission resources in RAN is carried out via a novel scalable and distributed algorithm based on Block Successive Upper-bound Minimization (BSUM). We prove that the proposed BCD algorithm converges to a Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) solution. Simulation results verify the efficiency and the efficacy of our BCD approach against two heuristic algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.701

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207