MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3129365398 · doi:10.22215/etd/2020-14020

Dinner for Two: Digging into how Ghrelin and Endocannabinoid Systems Interact in the Ventral Tegmental Area to Regulate Non-Homeostatic Feeding

2020· dissertation· en· W3129365398 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Edwards

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVentral tegmental areaEndocannabinoid systemGhrelinOrexigenicInternal medicineEndocrinologyCannabinoidGrowth hormone secretagogue receptorDopamineEnergy homeostasisCannabinoid receptorRimonabantBrain stimulation rewardNeuroscienceBiologyChemistryReceptorHormoneNeuropeptideMedicineAntagonistNucleus accumbensNeuropeptide Y receptorDopaminergic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ghrelin, a hormone produced by the stomach during times of energy deficiency, potently enhances feeding by activating its receptor, the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR).In the brain, GHSRs are highly expressed within the hypothalamus (HYP) and ventral tegmental area (VTA), brain regions responsible for regulating hunger-driven and reward/motivated feeding, respectively.Interestingly, endogenous cannabinoids (i.e.endocannabinoids) induce similar feeding effects by stimulating cannabinoid receptors (CB-1Rs) in many of the same brain regions that highly express GHSRs, including the HYP and VTA.Recent evidence showed that ghrelin requires endocannabinoid signaling within the HYP to promote food intake.While independent GHSR or CB-1R activation within the VTA increases motivated feeding, it is not known whether the effects of ghrelin in the VTA are also dependent on the endocannabinoid system.This thesis aimed to determine if these systems interact within the VTA and to ascertain the extent and underlying mechanism by which CB-1R signaling may mediate the capacity of ghrelin to promote motivated feeding behaviours within this region.We determined that genetic disruption of GHSRs suppresses the gene expression of important endocannabinoid system proteins and lowers endocannabinoid levels within the VTA.Moreover, we demonstrated that pharmacological antagonism of VTA CB-1Rs attenuated the potent orexigenic and motivational capacity of intra-VTA ghrelin.Electrophysiological investigations indicated that CB-1R antagonism blocked the ability of ghrelin to promote excitatory drive to VTA dopamine neurons, but that ghrelin may independently and directly stimulate these neurons.Together, our data show that CB-1R signaling mediates ghrelininduced motivated feeding behaviours in the VTA.Our findings suggest that, as in the HYP and VTA, ghrelin and endocannabinoid systems may interact in all brain regions where their receptors are jointly expressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity→French-language works237,207→