MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129386792 · doi:10.5194/epsc2020-821

Three-dimensional reconstruction and quantification of fluvial-deltaic sedimentary deposits in Gale crater, Mars, from rover-derived Digital Outcrop Models.

2020· article· en· W3129386792 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert Barnes, Sanjeev Gupta, Gerhard Paar, Arnold Bauer, Thomas Ortner, Christoph Traxler

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluvialMars Exploration ProgramGeologyOutcropSedimentary rockFaciesGeomorphologyPaleontologyAstrobiologyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern and ancient fluvial-deltaic systems on Earth contain highly diverse ecosystems in all terrestrial climates. Fluvial and lacustrine deposits have been discovered on Mars by the NASA Mars Science Laboratory rover Curiosity, and may be present in Oxia Planum, where the ESA/ROSCOSMOS ExoMars rover Rosalind Franklin is set to land in 2023. The primary aim of the ExoMars mission is to search for signs of past and present life on Mars. Whilst fluvio-deltaic-lacustrine sandstones and mudstones are high priority targets for sampling and drilling, it is important to obtain information on the palaeoenvironmental context of these deposits during mission exploration.The geometries of sedimentary structures and distribution of sedimentary facies within fluvial deposits provide information which can be used to reconstruct the geometries and flow parameters of these ancient systems. This provides us with quantitative means with which to make inferences on the ancient climate of Mars, and aids decision making with regards to rover science operations. Here we present a detailed quantitative 3D analysis of fluvial sedimentary architecture on Mars using rover image data. We used the 3D visualization software tool PRo3D1 to render the Shaler outcrop, observed at Yellowknife Bay by the NASA Mars Science Laboratory Rover, Curiosity2, as a scaled 3D textured model using the PRoViP 3D vision processing software3, and to map out key sedimentological features in order to characterize their geometry and dimensions, following existing facies descriptions4 .Mastcam data taken from different rover locations was processed into 3D surfaces and spatially matched to Navcam stereo-panoramas to create a digital outcrop model (DOM). The Shaler DOM was constructed using 17 Mastcam stereo-panoramas taken on Sols 120-121 and 309-324. A 30 m x 13 m area of the NE-SW trending outcrop was analysed. Sedimentary facies, key bounding surfaces and sedimentary structures were mapped out on the DOM (Fig. 1) and the dip and strike of lithological boundaries, key bounding surfaces, and cross-laminations were measured directly from the DOM. Apparent widths and thicknesses of the layers and cross-lamination sets were measured. Regularly spaced, sedimentary logs were collected and matched to illustrate the detailed internal structures of the outcrops analysed. Four types of sedimentary structures were identified; low-angle cross strata dipping to the SE (Fig. 2), ~ 50 cm thick; convex up, sub-parallel undulating laminations forming structures with 20-40 cm amplitude and 2 m wavelength; single sets of trough cross-laminations and compound, stacked cosets of trough cross-laminations, with thicknesses on average 9 cm, and yielding a common palaeoflow direction to the NE and SW. These data allow us to reconstruct the internal architecture of a fluvial bar-form which forms the Shaler outcrop, and quantify the key geometries and their spatial relationships in three-dimensions. These data are highly useful in providing context and relative timings for environmental reconstruction.Figure 1. Line interpretation of Shaler in PRo3D, showing the lithological boundaries (pink lines), facies assocation boundaries (green lines), accretion surfaces (yellow lines), layer contacts (white lines), cross-lamina sets (blue lines) and undulatory convex up bedforms (green lines). Figure 2. Detailed view of stacked sets of cross-laminations in the southwestern part of the Shaler outcrop. 1. Barnes et al., 2018, Geological Analysis of Martian Rover‐Derived Digital Outcrop Models Using the 3‐D Visualization Tool, Planetary Robotics 3‐D Viewer—PRo3D. Earth and Space Science.2. Grotzinger et al., 2014, A Habitable Fluvio-Lacustrine Environment at Yellowknife Bay, Gale Crater, Mars. Science3. Paar et al., 2015, PRoViDE: Planetary Robotics Vision Data Processing and Fusion. European Planetary Science Congress 2015.4. Edgar et al., 2017, Shaler: in situ analysis of a fluvial sedimentary deposit on Mars. Sedimentology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207