MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129501535 · doi:10.1089/dna.2020.6227

Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the IGT Gene Family in Allotetraploid Rapeseed ( <i>Brassica napus</i> L.)

2021· article· en· W3129501535 on OpenAlexaff
Chengming Sun, Chun Zhang, Xiaodong Wang, Xiaozhen Zhao, Wei Zhang, Maolong Hu, Sanxiong Fu, Bin Yi, Jiefu Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueDNA and Cell Biology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGeneticsGeneGene familyGene duplicationGenomeSegmental duplicationExonTandem exon duplicationSubfunctionalization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IGT family genes function critically to regulate lateral organ orientation in plants. However, little information is available about this family of genes in Brassica napus. In this study, 27 BnIGT genes were identified on 16 chromosomes and divided into seven clades, namely LAZY1∼LAZY6 and TAC1 (Tiller Angle Control 1), based on their phylogenetic relationships. Duplication analysis revealed that 91.1% of the gene pairs were derived from whole-genome duplication. Most BnIGT genes had a similar structural pattern with one or two very short exons followed by a long and a shorter exon. Common and specific motifs were identified among the seven clades, and motif 1, containing the family-specific GφL(A/T)IGT sequence, was observed in all clades except LAZY5. Three types of cis-elements pertinent to transcription factor binding, light responses, and hormone signaling were detected in the BnIGT promoters. Intriguingly, more than half of the BnIGT genes exhibited no or very low expression in various tissues, and the LAZY1 and TAC1 clade members showed distinct tissue expression preferences. Coexpression analysis revealed that the LAZY1 members had strong associations with cell wall biosynthesis genes. This analysis provides a deeper understanding of the BnIGT gene family and will facilitate further deduction of their role in regulating plant architecture in B. napus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDNA and Cell BiologySame topicPlant Molecular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207