MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129525929 · doi:10.6082/jgxpt-bc557

Welcome Work: Hospitality and the Mediation of Migrant Mobility in Swiss Integration Policy

2020· article· en· W3129525929 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Shirley Yeung

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Chicago
KeywordsHospitalityWork (physics)MediationPolitical scienceSociologyPublic relationsEngineeringTourismLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since 2005, Switzerland's federal Integration policy has structured the social inclusion of (im)migrants in the country; legal settlement, access to social aid, and naturalization itself are contingent on discretionary judgments as to whether a migrant is linguistically and culturally "integrated" into Swiss society. While public and policy discourse frame the concept of "integration" as a more inclusive departure from Switzerland's historically "assimilationist" migration policy, discussion has too often overlooked how the shifting and productively vague notion of "integration" constitutes a terrain of social practice—one where the tense, mutually constitutive relationship between reception and regulation, ethics and politics, is negotiated by a host of mobility mediators. Positioned in between migrant and citizen, these persons, often humanitarian volunteers (bénévoles) and "migrants" themselves, teach and broker the cultural-linguistic competences of integration while bridging, too, the ethical and economic dimensions of cross-border mobility. This dissertation draws on 14 months of ethnographic research, conducted in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, among volunteer workers, French language teachers, and undocumented persons distributed across a network of migrant aid agencies, NGOs, and centers of migrant-education in Geneva. The dissertation asks: How is the concept of "integration" in Geneva constructed and practiced? How does its practice enable or foreclose migrant legality? How do situated mediators broker migrants' economic and social mobility through acts of teaching and linguistic-cultural socialization? What forms of hospitality or solidarity do these envisage? And, in particular, what semiotic processes render the differences—the categories of mobility, person, and (in)hospitable practice—by which integration is imagined and performed? In analyzing everyday practices of migrant socialization, this dissertation advances the concept of "welcome work"—the forms of ethically-charged interstitial brokerage and mediation that aim to articulate migrant with state and citizen. Exploring the ironies and ambivalences of Swiss Integration policy, the dissertation chapters track varied scales and terrains of (in)hospitality: the social and policy distinctions between various types of national strangers/guests (and their relationship to the state's integration criteria); the moral-economic imagination of the French language in night classes for precarious migrant job-seekers; the cultivation of migrants' aesthetic sensibilities via pedagogies of "culture"; and practices of legal mediation by which migrant legality, presence, and Swiss jurisdiction itself are brokered and made. By examining the work of intermediaries on the integration front-line, this dissertation contributes to scholarship on mobility and migration by attending to the interstitial spaces of reception—the space between migrant and state that allows for their articulation to become conceivable in terms of "guest" and "host." In this space, "welcome work" becomes a salient terrain where mediators and migrants alike attempt to reconcile hospitable aspirations and ethics with a national politics of crisis management and border closure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago)Same topicMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207