MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129677422 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.104.024905

Determining the jet transport coefficient <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo></mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math> from inclusive hadron suppression measurements using Bayesian parameter estimation

2021· article· en· W3129677422 on OpenAlexafffund
Shanshan Cao, Y. Chen, J. P. Coleman, James Declan Mulligan, P.M. Jacobs, R. A. Soltz, A. Angerami, R. Arora, Steffen A. Bass, L. Cunqueiro, T. Dai, Lipei Du, R. J. Ehlers, Hannah Elfner, D. Everett, Wenkai Fan, Rainer J. Fries, Charles Gale, F. Garza, Yayun He, M. Heffernan, Ulrich Heinz, B. V. Jacak, Sangyong Jeon, Weiyao Ke, B. Kim, M. Kordell, Amit Kumar, Abhijit Majumder, Simon Mak, M. McNelis, C. Nattrass, Dmytro Oliinychenko, C. Park, Jean-François Paquet, J. Putschke, G. Roland, A. Silva, Björn Schenke, Loren Schwiebert, Chun Shen, C. Sirimanna, Y. Tachibana, G. Vujanovic, X.-N. Wang, Robert L. Wolpert, Yingru Xu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of the Vice President for Research, Wayne State UniversityOffice of ScienceScience and Technology Facilities CouncilCentral China Normal UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science FoundationCompute CanadaUniversity of Texas at AustinAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloMcGill UniversityU.S. Department of EnergyWayne State University
KeywordsStress (linguistics)Jet (fluid)Computer sciencePhysicsThermodynamicsSpeech recognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a new determination of $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{q}$, the jet transport coefficient of the quark-gluon plasma. We use the JETSCAPE framework, which incorporates a novel multistage theoretical approach to in-medium jet evolution and Bayesian inference for parameter extraction. The calculations, based on the Matter and Lbt jet quenching models, are compared to experimental measurements of inclusive hadron suppression in $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ collisions at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) and $\mathrm{Pb}+\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The correlation of experimental systematic uncertainties is accounted for in the parameter extraction. The functional dependence of $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{q}$ on jet energy or virtuality and medium temperature is based on a perturbative picture of in-medium scattering, with components reflecting the different regimes of applicability of Matter and Lbt. In the multistage approach, the switch between Matter and Lbt is governed by a virtuality scale ${Q}_{0}$. Comparison of the posterior model predictions to the RHIC and LHC hadron suppression data shows reasonable agreement, with moderate tension in limited regions of phase space. The distribution of $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{q}/{T}^{3}$ extracted from the posterior distributions exhibits weak dependence on jet momentum and medium temperature $T$, with 90% credible region (CR) depending on the specific choice of model configuration. The choice of Matter$+$Lbt, with switching at virtuality ${Q}_{0}$, has 90% CR of $2<\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{q}/{T}^{3}<4$ for ${p}_{T,\mathrm{jet}}>40 \mathrm{GeV}/c$. The value of ${Q}_{0}$, determined here for the first time, is in the range 2.0--2.7 GeV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations131
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchFrench-language works237,207