Genetic‐based multi‐objective optimization of alkylation process by a hybrid model of statistical and artificial intelligence approaches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The purpose of this research is to find the optimal operating point in the production process of the cumene. Therefore, the production process was optimized through statistical and genetic algorithm‐based methods. The performance of an alkylation reactor was optimized through maximizing the yield of cumene production. Response surface methodology (RSM) with design type of central composite was applied for design of experiment, modelling, and optimizing the process. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for finding the important operative parameters as well as their effects. The effects of three parameters including temperature, reactor length, and pressure on the alkylation process were investigated. Further, two types of feed‐forward neural network were applied to model the alkylation reactor. To develop the neural network model, leave‐one‐out method was used. The best prediction performance belonged to a fitting network with 2 and 8 neurons in the hidden layer, respectively. This model was used for optimizing the performance of the alkylation reactor. The statistical and artificial intelligence systems were capable of prediction of cumene production yield in different conditions with R2 of 0.9098 and 0.9986, respectively. Genetic algorithm‐based optimization was performed by the developed neural network model. The maximum accessible value of cumene production yield was 0.7771, which can be achieved when the temperature, length of reactor, and column pressure are 160°C, 2 m, and 4000 kPa, respectively. By finding the optimal operating point in the cumene production process, capital cost, energy consumption, and other operating costs can be significantly reduced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".