MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129875551 · doi:10.2118/spe-169785-ms

New Insights on the Impact of High Temperature Conditions (176°C) on Carbonate and Sulphate Scale Dissolver Performance

2014· article· en· W3129875551 on OpenAlexaff
M. M. Jordan, Helen Williams, Sandra Linares-Samaniego, Dario M. Frigo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsNalco (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbonateDissolutionSolventCalciteSolubilityChemistryAqueous solutionBarium carbonatePrecipitationCitric acidInorganic chemistryEnvironmental chemistryMineralogyRaw materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Scale-dissolver technology has been developed and applied with varying degrees of success over the past few years to remove carbonate and the more challenging sulphate/sulphide scales from production tubing and process equipment. It can often seem a much safer, more cost-effective remediation approach than physical removal, in particular, in the new generation of HP/HT fields, where any physical well intervention carries high risk, while the high temperatures would normally be beneficial in enhancing scale solubility and dissolution rate. The current paper reports dissolution characterstics of three solvents for calcite, barite, celestite and anhydrite in the temperature range 85°C to 176° to verify their performance up to the very high temperatures of a specific HP/HT development. These solvents included a typical alkaline-pH chelant for sulphate scale, an organic-acid mixture for carbonate scales, and a novel neutral-pH chelant as a less corrosive solvent for carbonate scale removal. In some tests the liquid-to-solid ratiowasvaried to evaluate the impact of excess scale on solvent performance. The performance against BaSO4 of the alkaline-pH chelant unexpectedly declines very significantly at 176°C relative to that observed at 85°C. Thermal instability was ruled out as the cause becausethe solvent showed very limited decline in performance when tested at 85°C after it had been thermally aged at 176°C. Performance at 176°C showed an initial rise followed by a decreasein aqueous barium ions, strongly indicating secondary re-precipitation of a barium-containing species at this temperature. In contrast, dissolution rates of carbonate scale by organic acid were greaterat the higher temperature, as would be expected. The novel neutral chelant showed a decline in calcite dissolution performance during the 176°C test but unlike the alkaline-pH chelant used for sulphate scale, this chelant showed degradation after thermal ageing and re-testing at 85°C. The findings from this paper suggest that there is temperature limit above which effective removal of sulphate scales may not be feasible with the selected solvents due to re-precipitation of a secondary reaction product, while for carbonate removal the current neutral chelants tested have a thermal stability issue at 176°C. These findings need to be considered when evaluating the potential role of chemical remediation in the overall scale-control strategy for HP/HT fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207