Genome-wide association study of body fat distribution traits in Hispanics/Latinos from the HCHS/SOL Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Central obesity is a leading health concern with a great burden carried by ethnic minority populations, and especially Hispanics/Latinos. Genetic factors contribute to the obesity burden overall and to inter-population differences. We aim to: 1) identify novel loci associated with central adiposity measured as waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist circumference (WC), and hip circumference (HIP), all adjusted for body mass index (adjBMI), using the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL); 2) determine if differences in genetic associations differ by background group within HCHS/SOL; 3) determine whether previously reported association regions generalize to HCHS/SOL. Our analyses included 7,472 women and 5,200 men of mainland (Mexican, Central and South American) and Caribbean (Puerto Rican, Cuban, and Dominican) background residing in the US, with genome-wide array data imputed to the 1000 genomes Phase I multiethnic reference panel. We analyzed associations stratified by sex in addition to sexes combined using linear mixed-model regression. We identified 16 variants for WHRadjBMI, 22 for WCadjBMI, and 28 for HIPadjBMI that reached suggestive significance (P<1×10 −6 ). Many of the loci exhibited differences in strength of associations by ethnic background and sex. We brought a total of 66 variants forward for validation in nine cohort studies (N=34,161) with participants of Hispanic/Latino, African and European descent. We confirmed four novel loci (ancestry-specific P<0.05 in replication, consistent direction of effect with HCHS/SOL, and P<5×10 −8 after meta-analysis with HCHS/SOL), including rs13301996 in the sexes-combined analysis, and rs79478137 for women-only for WHRadjBMI; rs28692724 in women-only for HIPadjBMI; and rs3168072 in the sexes combined analysis for WCadjBMI. Also, a total of eight previously reported WHRadjBMI association regions, 12 for HIPadjBMI, and 10 for WCadjBMI generalized to HCHS/SOL. Our study findings highlight the importance of large-scale genomic studies in ancestrally diverse Hispanic/Latino populations for identifying and characterizing central obesity-susceptibility that may be ancestry-specific.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".