Quasi‐Periodic Intensification of Convective Asymmetries in the Outer Eyewall of Typhoon Lekima (2019)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Typhoon Lekima (2019) possessed a double‐eyewall structure before making landfall in eastern China, with its outer eyewall showing quasi‐periodic convective intensification. Several physical mechanisms that may cause eyewall convection asymmetries were examined. The upshear occurrence of the strongest convection could not be explained by either the typhoon's motion or the effect of descending inflow from outer rainbands. Radar reflectivity analysis showed that phase locking occurred between the wavenumber‐2 vortex Rossby waves (VRWs) propagating radially outward from the inner eyewall and the azimuthally propagating wavenumber‐1 VRWs on the inner edge of the outer eyewall. Additional phase locking further arose between the aforementioned wavenumber‐1 VRWs and the azimuthally propagating wavenumber‐2 VRWs on the outer edge of the outer eyewall. These two phase‐locking processes led to the pronounced quasi‐periodic intensification of the convective asymmetry in the western semicircle of Lekima's outer eyewall.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".