Pro-sumers on the move: overcoming the line between labour and consumption
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introducing the wave of the prosumers in the age oflabour market shattering, by Davide Arcidiacono, AllisonLoconto, Lara Maestripieri, Antonello PoddaPart I: Redefinition of boundaries between consumptionand work: working for/as/with the consumersLabour behind consumption. The lived experiences of service workers interacting with customers, by Diego Coletto, Giovanna FullinBrands and productive publics in the event economy: the case of Milano Design Week, by Alberto CossuPublic data and value creation in Italy. The findings from the Open Data 200 study, by Francesca De ChiaraPart II: The sharing economy and the role of prosumers in the platform paradigmAre weak relations working? Sharing platforms and social capital, by Alberta Andreotti, Guido Anselmi, Christian HoffmannMeeting the prosumer: Transporting, hosting and feeding people in the sharing economy, by Francesca Setiffi, Gian Paolo Lazzer, Vincenzo ScottoFrom Civic Food Networks to Civic Food Platforms: collaboration, trust and empowerment in the New Food Economy, by Stefano Spillare, Roberta Paltrinieri, Lucia MarciantePart III: Prosumers and Welfare innovationWelfare sharing: an emerging paradigm? An explorative study based on two cases, by Martina VisentinHome Pooling: Applying co-governance to the housing sector, by Monica Bernardi, Christian Iaione, Chiara PreveteSocial Change for Sustainable Localised Food Sovereignty: Convergence between Prosumers and Ethical Entrepreneurs, by Rachel Reckinger
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".