MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3130444490 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10506244.1

Radiative transfer and viewing geometry considerations for the SIF/GPP relationship

2021· preprint· en· W3130444490 on OpenAlexaffabout
Zoe Pierrat, Alexander Norton, Nicholas C. Parazoo, Andrew J. Maguire, Katja Großmann, Troy S. Magney, Alan Barr, Bruce Johnson, J. Stutz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsGlobal Institute for Water SecurityUniversity of SaskatchewanEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsElectronic mailWorld Wide WebComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solar-Induced chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) provides a powerful proxy for determining forest gross primary production (GPP), particularly in evergreen ecosystems where traditional measures of greenness fail. The dynamics of the SIF/GPP relationship, however, are poorly understood under varying viewing directions and light conditions. This is, in large part, due to challenges in measuring SIF at the spatiotemporal scale that is necessary to understand these effects. Therefore, the aim of this work is to utilize high-temporal and spatial resolution SIF measurements to better constrain the response of SIF to ambient canopy illumination and viewing geometry. We use a PhotoSpec instrument and eddy covariance measurements to explore the SIF/GPP relationship under various viewing directions and light conditions during the 2019 and 2020 growing seasons at the Old Black Spruce site in Saskatchewan, Canada. PhotoSpec is a tower-based 2-D scanning spectrometer system capable of taking Fraunhofer-line based SIF retrievals in the red and far-red wavelength ranges with a 0.7 degree field of view at a ~30 second time resolution. Measured SIF and GPP are combined with SCOPE modelling results to provide a mechanistic understanding of the physical and ecophysiological drivers for the SIF/GPP relationship in the Boreal Forest. Our results show that viewing direction and solar zenith/azimuth angles are important for the SIF signal under direct light conditions, but not under diffuse. Furthermore, the SIF/GPP relationship changes under direct and diffuse light conditions at a 30 minute, daily, and monthly resolution. Our ability to use SIF as a proxy for GPP depends on a quantitative understanding of radiative transfer within the canopy and how scanning geometry impacts SIF measurements. These results provide an important insight into these relationships in the Boreal forest, a region where GPP has been traditionally difficult to track using remote sensing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→