MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

In Vitro Functional Characterization and in Silico Prediction of Rare Genetic Variation in the Bile Acid and Drug Transporter, Na<sup>+</sup>-Taurocholate Cotransporting Polypeptide (NTCP, <i>SLC10A1</i>)

2020· article· en· W3130483070 on OpenAlexafffund
Laura Russell, Yitian Zhou, Volker M. Lauschke, Richard B. Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Pharmaceutics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchVetenskapsrådetKarolinska Institutet
KeywordsIn silicoRosuvastatinTransporterTaurocholic acidChemistryOrganic anion transporter 1In vitroHEK 293 cellsBile acidBiologyBiochemistryPharmacologyReceptorGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Na+-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP, SLC10A1) is a key hepatic uptake transporter for bile acids and drugs and is the main functional receptor for hepatitis B and D viruses. Next-generation sequencing has revealed that a large number of rare SLC10A1 variants exist in the population. Little data exist regarding head-to-head comparison of in silico algorithms to predict functional effects of pharmacogenetic variants when compared to direct in vitro functional assessment. This study aimed at characterizing rare SLC10A1 variants in vitro and to assess the performance of seven in silico algorithms to predict the observed functional impacts. Thirty-five previously uncharacterized, rare, missense SLC10A1 variants were transiently expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 type T (HEK293T) cells. NCTP protein expression as well as uptake of substrates taurocholic acid (TCA) and rosuvastatin were assessed. Substrate-specific effects were observed for NTCP G191R, with TCA and rosuvastatin transport observed at 89 and 8% of wild-type (WT) uptake, respectively. Significantly reduced transport of TCA and rosuvastatin was observed for 19 variants (p < 0.05), with seven variants displaying decreased protein expression and marked reduction in transport of both substrates (0–13% of WT uptake, p < 0.0001). Performance of in silico algorithms to predict in vitro uptake, assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCROC), ranged from 0.69 to 0.97 and 0.72 to 0.84 for TCA and rosuvastatin uptake, respectively. In conclusion, we identified rare variants with significantly reduced NTCP expression and function. We demonstrated that no algorithm performed robustly enough to replace functional study in vitro, particularly given the broad substrate specificity of many pharmacogenes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular PharmaceuticsSame topicDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsFrench-language works237,207