MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3130618957 · doi:10.26456/vtpsyped/2020.1.128

PSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CHILDREN-ORPHANS, ARE PRONE TO VICTIMIZATION BEHAVIOR

2020· article· ru· W3130618957 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Маргарита Александровна Данилова, Татьяна Васильевна Юдеева

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Тверского государственного университета Серия Педагогика и психология · 2020
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology of Development and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPsycheToronto Alexithymia ScaleDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychologyAlexithymia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Представлены результаты эмпирического исследования психологических особенностей детей-сирот, склонных к виктимному поведению. Выявлены и описаны различия в психологических особенностях детей-сирот, склонных к виктимному поведению, и подростков, у которых нет склонности к виктимному поведению. У подростков-сирот, склонных к виктимному поведению, выявлены высокий уровень агрессивности, высокий уровень выраженности алекситимии, низкие показатели самоуверенности. В исследовании были использованы следующие методики: тест склонности к виктимному поведению О.О. Андронниковой; опросник уровня агрессивности Басса-Перри; Торонтская алекситимическая шкала; методика исследования самоотношения В.В. Столина, С.Р. Пантелеева. Результаты исследования могут быть полезными для психологов и педагогов в подготовке мероприятий, посвященных профилактике виктимного поведения подростков. Практическое применение результатов данного исследования в перспективе может позволить создать модель психологической помощи детям-сиротам, склонным к виктимному поведению, реализующую коррекцию гиперфункции защитных механизмов психики последних. The results of an empirical study of the psychological characteristics of orphans prone to victim behavior are presented. Differences in psychological characteristics of orphans prone to victimization and adolescents who do not have a tendency to victim behavior are identified and described. High level of aggressiveness, high level of alexithymia severity, low self-confidence indices were revealed in orphans prone to victim behavior. The following methods were used in the study: test of propensity to victim behavior by O.O. Andronnikova; Bass-Perry aggressiveness level questionnaire; Toronto alexithymic scale; V.V. Stolin, S.R. Pantileev self-attitude research methodology. The results of the study can be useful for psychologists and educators in the preparation of activities dedicated to the prevention of victim behavior of adolescents. Practical application of the results of this study in the future, may allow to create a model of psychological assistance to orphans prone to victim behavior, implementing the correction of hyperfunction of the protective mechanisms of the psyche of the latter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueВестник Тверского государственного университета Серия Педагогика и психологияSame topicPsychology of Development and EducationFrench-language works237,207