Effect of interaction between two single-particle-impingements on the repassivation behavior of 304 stainless steel in a simulated groundwater
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract To investigate the effect of interaction between two single-Si 3 N 4 particle-impingements on the repassivation of 304 stainless steel in a simulated groundwater, the corrosion current peaks of the samples during the impingement were recorded, and the micro-hardness of the substrate around the crater was tested. The results indicated that significant interactions between the two impingements were observed only when the value of distance-diameter ratio ( L/d ) was less than 1.5. With L/d being less than 1.5, the corrosion current peaks and mass losses due to the second impingements were higher than those of the first ones, and the re-passivation rates of samples during the second impingements were lower than those of the first impingements. Simultaneously, the microhardness of the substrate between the two craters was higher than that of the surface around one single crater with the same distance-diameter ratio. The mechanisms of how the L/d ratio influenced the interaction between the two impingements are also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".