WORK MOTIVATION TO AFECTIVE COMMITMENT THROUGH JOB SATISFACTION IN EMPLOYEES PRONAFA SKIN CLINIC
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Employees are important components in a company, related to how the company can achieve its goals. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of work motivation (reward) on employee commitment through perceived satisfaction. The object used in this study is Pronafa Skin Clinic in Sidoarjo. Data collection was specifically carried out by distributing questionnaires to the study sample. The sample was determined using non-probability sampling techniques and obtained as many as 45 employees as research respondents. The analytical method used is path analysis with the SmartPLS program. The results found that both hypotheses were accepted. (1) The first result found that work motivation (reward) has a positive and significant effect on commitment. (2) The second result found that satisfaction has a significant role in mediating the effect of work motivation (reward) on commitment. Keywords: Work Motivation, Reward, Commitment, Satisfaction
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it