MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3130907086

Quality of Life in Patients of Schizophrenia with or without Depression: A Comparative Study

2021· article· en· W3130907086 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Parul Gupta, Pradeep S Patil

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Depression (economics)Quality of life (healthcare)PsychopathologyPsychiatryPositive and Negative Syndrome ScalePsychologyClinical psychologyRating scaleSocial supportMedicinePsychosisPsychotherapistDevelopmental psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Quality of Life (QOL) is the broad term defined as the individual perception of well being and experience of satisfaction by them under current life situation. Depression among patients with schizophrenia observed as one of the most important factor affecting the QOL and we need to further assess it. Aim and objectives: We aim to compare the quality of life in the patients of schizophrenia with depression and without depression and to assess the influence of many other variables like psychopathology and social support on QOL  in patients of schizophrenia with or without depression. Methodology:  The study will be conducted in psychiatry department of AVBRH, Sawangi, which is affiliated to DattaMeghe institute of Medical sciences, Wardha . We will select 120 patients who are clinically diagnosed to have schizophrenia according to the ICD-10 then will further assess them on Calgary Depression Rating Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) for dividing them into two groups i.e. with depression and without depression schizophrenia. Then we will be applying Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) for psychopathology, WHO QOLscale(WHOQOL-BREF) to assess qol and then Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ) for the perceived social support. Later comparison will be made between both the groups to see which group had more influence on quality of life using appropriate statistical methods. Expected results: The outcome of this study will help in correlating how significantly the QOL in the clinically diagnosed patients of schizophrenia with depression and without depression gets affected and we will be able to answer the role of QOL , positive and negative symptoms and  social support in the patients of schizophrenia with depression and without depression. Conclusion: With this study we will be able to correlate how significantly depression, psychopathology, social support can affect the QOL in the patients of schizophrenia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the Romanian Society for Cell BiologySame topicMental Health Treatment and AccessFrench-language works237,207