Impact of exposures to persistent endocrine disrupting compounds on the sperm methylome in regions associated with neurodevelopmental disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Although autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is among the most heritable of neurodevelopmental disorders, the rapidly rising prevalence of ASD suggests that environmental factors may interact with genetic risk for ASD. Environmental factors may impact both gene expression and phenotypes in ASD through epigenetic modifications that, in turn, could lead to intergenerational effects influencing risk for ASDs. Endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs), such as the long-lived organochlorines, are of particular interest with respect to risk for autism because of their ability to interfere with sex hormones that have been implicated in the regulation of RORA , a dysregulated gene in ASD that is a master regulator of many other ASD risk genes. Objectives The specific aims of this study are to: 1) investigate whether high versus low exposures to the persistent organochlorine 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene (DDE) are associated with differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in sperm from a Faroese cohort whose natural diet of pilot whale meat and blubber exposes them to higher than average levels of organic pollutants; 2) determine if genes associated with DDE DMRs are enriched for ASD risk genes; 3) identify pathways and functions over-represented among genes associated with DMRs. Methods Whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) was used to identify genome-wide DMRs in sperm from individuals divided by high and low exposure levels. Gene ontology and pathway analyses were used to determine enrichment in functional relationships to ASD. Results Genes in DMRs not only could discriminate between high and low exposures to DDE, but also were enriched in autism risk genes. Gene ontology and pathway analyses of these genes show significant enrichment for neurodevelopmental processes frequently impacted by ASD. Conclusion Results of this study show that elevated exposure to certain organochlorines is associated with genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in sperm affecting genes involved in neurological functions and developmental disorders, including ASD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".