MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3131079610 · doi:10.1101/2021.02.19.21251501

Disorganization of language and working memory systems in frontal versus temporal lobe epilepsy

2021· preprint· en· W3131079610 on OpenAlexafffund
Lorenzo Caciagli, Casey Paquola, Xiaosong He, Christian Vollmar, María Centeno, Britta Wandschneider, Urs Braun, Karin Trimmel, Sjoerd B. Vos, Meneka K. Sidhu, Pamela J. Thompson, Sallie Baxendale, Gavin P. Winston, John S. Duncan, Danielle S. Bassett, Matthias J. Koepp, Boris C. Bernhardt

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchEpilepsy SocietyCanada Research ChairsUniversity College LondonNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchInstitute for Scientific InterchangeEuropean Academy of NeurologyCentre Azrieli de recherche sur l'autisme, Institut et Hôpital Neurologiques de MontréalHospital for Sick ChildrenWellcome TrustAmerican Epilepsy SocietyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJohn D. and Catherine T. MacArthur FoundationAlfred P. Sloan FoundationBrain Research UK
KeywordsWorking memoryTemporal lobeDefault mode networkEpilepsyFrontal lobeCognitive psychologyPsychologyCognitionNeuropsychologyEpisodic memoryNeuroscienceVerbal fluency testFluencyNeural correlates of consciousnessAudiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Cognitive impairment is a common comorbidity of epilepsy, and adversely impacts people with both frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) and temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). While the underlying neural substrates in TLE have been extensively investigated, functional imaging studies in FLE are scarce. In this study, we profiled cognitive dysfunction in FLE, and directly compared FLE and TLE patients to establish commonalities and differences. We investigated 172 adult participants (56 with FLE, 64 with TLE, and 52 controls), using neuropsychological tests and four functional MRI tasks probing the neural correlates of expressive language (verbal fluency, verb generation) and working memory (verbal and visuo-spatial). Patient groups were comparable in disease duration and anti-epileptic drug load. We devised a multiscale approach to map the landscape of brain activation and deactivation during cognition, and track reorganization in FLE and TLE. Voxel-based analyses were complemented with profiling of task effects (i) across intrinsic functional systems, and (ii) along the principal functional connectivity gradient, which encodes a continuous transition from lower-level sensory to higher-order transmodal brain areas. We show that cognitive impairment in FLE is associated with reduced activation across attentional and executive systems, and reduced deactivation of the default mode system, indicative of a large-scale disorganization of task-related recruitment. Functional abnormalities in FLE were modulated by disease load. Patterns of dysfunction in FLE were broadly similar to those in TLE, but some traits were syndrome-specific: altered default-mode deactivation was more prominent in FLE, while impaired recruitment of posterior language areas during a task with semantic demands was more marked in TLE. Our study elucidates neural processes underlying language and working memory impairment in FLE, identifies shared and syndrome-specific alterations in the two most common focal epilepsies, and sheds light on system behavior that may be amenable to future remediation strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.672

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207