MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3131094668 · doi:10.1190/geo2020-0146.1

Stress-sensitive permeability of matrix cores and artificially fractured cores with nonproppant-filled fractures under high-pressure conditions

2021· article· en· W3131094668 on OpenAlexaff
Ren-Shi Nie, Zheng Wang, Zhangxin Chen, Ancheng Wang, Changhong Zhou, J van der Lei, Yi Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsOverburden pressurePermeability (electromagnetism)Matrix (chemical analysis)Effective stressStress (linguistics)Tight gasHydrostatic testGeologyExponential functionGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceMechanicsPetroleum engineeringMineralogyHydraulic fracturingComposite materialChemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Stress-sensitive permeability (SSP) influences gas well productivity and is a crucial element influencing gas reservoir development. SSP for high-pressure fractured gas reservoirs with an initial reservoir pressure of more than 20 MPa has never been comprehensively evaluated to the best of our knowledge. SSP experiments with special procedures were designed by adopting the variable confining pressure (VCP) and variable internal pressure (VIP) methods. VCP is a test method in which the confining pressure is altered and a constant internal pressure is maintained for the experimental core holder. VIP is a test method in which the internal pressure is changed and a constant confining pressure is maintained. A four-stage curve analysis method was developed to perform regressions on semilogarithmic curves and exponential curves of experimental data. A method to evaluate the SSP was developed using stress sensitivity coefficients obtained via regressions. A calculation approach for determining the degrees of permeability damage and permeability recovery also was evaluated. In total, six matrix cores and six cores with artificial fractures from a high-pressure fractured sandstone gas reservoir were tested using the two methods. The SSP curves for high-pressure reservoirs were characterized by four-stage variation trends, which show differentiation with low-pressure reservoirs with an initial reservoir pressure less than 20 MPa. The stress sensitivity of the VCP method was stronger than that of the VIP method. The core samples mainly showed a “medium”/“medium-strong” stress sensitivity under low/high effective stress conditions. Compared with matrix cores, fractured cores showed stronger stress sensitivity owing to strong plasticity and weak elasticity. The maximum permeability damage degree reached 99.67%, and the minimum permeability recovery was only 6.9%. Our method of experimental design, four-stage curve analysis, stress sensitivity evaluation, and our overall findings can provide references for future studies on SSP in high-pressure fractured sandstone gas reservoirs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207