MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3131284512 · doi:10.1093/res/hgab004

<scp>Sandra Spanier</scp> and <scp>Miriam B. Mandel</scp> (eds). <i>The Letters of Ernest Hemingway</i>

2021· article· en· W3131284512 on OpenAlexaff
Austin Long

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Review of English Studies · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtArt historyPerformance artLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fifth volume (of a now-projected seventeen) of Hemingway’s letters opens with Sandra Spanier’s reference to one of the volume’s many wonderful plates: Vanity Fair’s 1934 ‘full-page, full-color Ernest Hemingway paper doll, captioned “Ernest Hemingway, America’s own literary cave man; hard-drinking, hard-fighting, hard-loving—all for art’s sake”’ (p. xvii; see also plate 29). The Hemingway paper doll is literally a caveman complete with dead rabbit, club, and leopard-skin toga and is labelled ‘Ernie, the Neanderthal Man’. Subscribers could then cut out various costumes to dress up Ernie: Ernie as Don José, the toreador (a matador suit complete with cape, hat, and dead bull), Ernie as the Lost Generation (seated at a Parisian café surrounded by empty bottles), Ernie as the Unknown Soldier (on crutches limping away from a burning field hospital). It is not a modern revelation to emphasize, if not criticize, the performativity of Hemingway’s personae. In this volume,...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1860.170

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Review of English StudiesSame topicAmerican and British Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207