MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3131487333 · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2021.102844

Ozanimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis: Pooled safety results from the clinical development program

2021· article· en· W3131487333 on OpenAlexaff
Krzysztof Selmaj, Jeffrey A. Cohen, Gıancarlo Comı, Amit Bar‐Or, Douglas L. Arnold, Lawrence Steinman, Hans Hartung, Xavier Montalbán, Eva Havrdová, Bruce Cree, Neil Minton, James K. Sheffield, Ning Ding, Ludwig Kappos

Bibliographic record

VenueMultiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityNeuroRx Research (Canada)Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersSanofi GenzymeAllerganEMD SeronoMedDay PharmaceuticalsInnosuisse - Schweizerische Agentur für InnovationsförderungSchweizerische Multiple Sklerose GesellschaftEisaiAlexion PharmaceuticalsSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungMultiple Sclerosis SocietyMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyAtara BiotherapeuticsMylanBaxaltaTG TherapeuticsNational Research FoundationF. Hoffmann-La RocheNovartisCelgeneBayerPfizerBiogenRocheTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesBayer HealthCareEuropean CommissionMultiple Sclerosis International FederationSanofiGenentechNational Multiple Sclerosis SocietyMerckCSL BehringBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineMedDRAPopulationAdverse effectPlaceboClinical trialIncidence (geometry)Phases of clinical researchPathologyPharmacovigilance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Ozanimod, an oral sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 and 5 modulator, is approved in multiple countries for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). In phase 3 trials, ozanimod was well tolerated and superior to interferon beta-1a 30 µg once-weekly in reducing clinical and radiologic disease activity. The objective of this integrated safety analysis was to evaluate the safety of extended ozanimod exposure in participants with RMS from all clinical trials and compare it with phase 3 trial data. METHODS: We report pooled incidence and study duration‒adjusted incidence rates (IR) of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from an interim data cut (January 31, 2019) of RMS participants treated with ozanimod. Data were pooled from a phase 1 pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic trial, a placebo-controlled phase 2 trial with dose-blinded extension, 2 large active-controlled phase 3 trials, and an open-label extension (OLE). Results were compared with pooled phase 3 trial data. RESULTS: At the data cutoff, 2631 RMS participants had exposure to ozanimod 0.92 mg (mean 32.0 months) and 2787 had exposure to either ozanimod 0.46 or 0.92 mg (mean 37.1 months). The IRs per 1000 person-years (PY) for any TEAE (772.2) and serious TEAEs (33.2) in the overall population were similar to those in the phase 3 population (896.1 and 31.2, respectively). There were no serious opportunistic infections. There were no second-degree or higher atrioventricular blocks on electrocardiogram. Hepatic enzyme elevations declined over time. Malignancy rates remained low with longer exposure. Pulmonary function tests showed minimal reductions in lung function. Seven ozanimod-treated participants with comorbid risk factors had confirmed macular edema, including 3 in the ongoing OLE. CONCLUSIONS: Safety results in this larger RMS population with greater ozanimod exposure demonstrated no new safety concerns and were consistent with phase 3 trial results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMultiple Sclerosis and Related DisordersSame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207