High‐Performance Flexible Micro‐Supercapacitors Printed on Textiles for Powering Wearable Electronics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Fabrication of flexible micro‐supercapacitors (MSCs) on textiles as miniaturized power supplies for wearable electronics is still a great challenge. In this work, we proposed a facile protocol to fabricate MSCs directly on textiles by combining inkjet printing and extrusion printing. Benefiting from its multi‐step printing strategy, the textile‐based MSCs still maintain their unique porous electrode structure as well as rapid electron transferability. Compared with only extrusion printing, the MSCs with a multi‐step printing strategy exhibit a remarkably enhanced electrochemical performance (8.8 mF cm−2 @0.5 mA cm−2, 1.0 mF cm−2 @5 mF cm−2), an elongated cycle life (6000 times), and superior mechanical flexibility (2000 times @90°). Moreover, benefiting from the digital printing capability, flexible MSCs in serials can be directly prepared and conveniently integrated with conductive textiles to support wearable electronics systems. This simple printing method would show extensive potential in the fabrication of energy‐based devices and wearable functional electronics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".