Assessing single photon LiDAR for operational implementation of an enhanced forest inventory in diverse mixedwood forests
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Airborne laser scanning (ALS; LiDAR) data are an increasingly common data source for forest inventories, and approaches integrating ALS data with field plot measurements have become operational in several jurisdictions. As technology continues to evolve, different LiDAR sensors can provide new opportunities to incorporate LiDAR data into forest inventory workflows. Single photon LiDAR (SPL) enables efficient, large area data acquisition and merits further investigation for forest inventory applications. Herein, we investigated the capacity of leaf-on SPL data, combined with 269 field plots, for estimating forest inventory attributes in the Great Lakes–St. Lawrence mixedwood forests of southern Ontario, Canada. Inventory attribute estimates were validated at the stand level using independent reference data acquired for 27 intensively sampled stands. Top height, Lorey’s height, gross total volume for merchantable stems, merchantable stem volume, basal area, quadratic mean diameter, and total aboveground biomass were estimated with a relative RMSE of 13.52%, 7.24%, 14.61%, 16.27%, 14.42%, 12.25%, and 11.72%, respectively. Relative bias was < 1% for all attributes except top height (10.34%), merchantable volume (3.37%), and basal area (1.68%). Accuracy and bias varied by forest type and stand-level validation was important for assessing model performance in different stand conditions. SPL data can be used to generate accurate, area-based forest inventories in mixedwood forests that have a multitude of tree species and complex forest management histories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".