Chemical and physical properties of tribofilms formed by the interaction of ashless dithiophosphate anti‐wear additives
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Physiochemical properties of tribofilms generated from octadecylthioperoxydiphosphate (SSC18) and octadecylphosphorofluoridothioate (PFC18) were compared with zinc dialkyl dithiophosphates (ZDDP) in this study. PFC18 and SSC18 were chemically synthesised and mixed in mineral base oil to prepare test oil formulations. Additionally, PFC18 and SSC18 were mixed at different concentrations and evaluated for their compatibility and tribological performance using high frequency reciprocating rig (HFRR) tribometer. All lubricant formulations with ashless additives exhibited superior anti‐wear characteristics compared to ZDDP. Comprehensive surface analysis of tribofilms was conducted using scanning electron microscopy, nano‐indentation and X‐ray absorption near edge spectroscopy. Formulations containing only SSC18 and PFC18 exhibited a uniform and continuous tribofilm formation, while formulations with a combination of SSC18 and PFC18 had a stable pad‐like structure. X‐ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) results indicate ashless PFC18 and SSC18 by themselves and in combination form iron phosphate enriched tribofilms with a mixture of iron sulfides and/or sulfates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it