Similar impact and replacement disease after pneumococcal conjugate vaccine introduction in hospitalised children with invasive pneumococcal disease in Europe and North America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High incidence of childhood invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in the US declined steeply after 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) introduction, outweighing reductions observed elsewhere. We re-analysed aggregate published data and compared pre- and post-PCV IPD-incidence in different countries to explore PCV impact on hospitalised and outpatient IPD separately. The proportion of hospitalised IPD cases was consistently high (>80%) in England&Wales, Finland, the Netherlands, and Quebec/Canada, but only 32% in the US before PCV introduction, increasing to 69% during the PCV era. In the US, a higher reduction in outpatient IPD incidence (94% in 2015 versus 1998-99) was observed compared to hospitalised IPD (79%); a 51% reduction in the non-PCV13-type IPD incidence among outpatient cases was estimated compared to a >2-fold increase for hospitalised cases. After stratification by hospitalization status, PCV programmes resulted in similar impact and serotype replacement in hospitalised IPD in US when compared to other countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".