MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3131870992 · doi:10.1186/s13041-021-00752-3

The IL33 receptor ST2 contributes to mechanical hypersensitivity in mice with neuropathic pain

2021· article· en· W3131870992 on OpenAlexafffund
Junting Huang, Vinícius M. Gadotti, Zizhen Zhang, Gerald W. Zamponi

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Brain · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSNiNeuropathic painInnate immune systemTLR2ReceptorNerve injuryMedicineChronic painImmunityImmunologyNeuroscienceImmune systemPharmacologyBiologyInternal medicineAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pathogen infection triggers pain via activation of the innate immune system. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and Nod-like receptors (NLRs) are the main components of innate immunity and have been implicated in pain signaling. We previously revealed that the TLR2-NLRP3-IL33 pathway mediates inflammatory pain responses during hyperactivity of innate immunity. However, their roles in neuropathic pain had remained unclear. Here we report that although knockout of TLR2 or NLRP3 does not affect spared nerve injury (SNI)-induced neuropathic pain, intrathecal inhibition of IL33/ST2 signaling with ST2 neutralizing antibodies reverses mechanical thresholds in SNI mice compared to PBS vehicle treated animals. This effect indicates a universal role of IL33 in both inflammatory and neuropathic pain states, and that targeting the IL33/ST2 axis could be a potential therapeutic approach for pain treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular BrainSame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207