MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Three-Fingered Robot Hand Based on the Slider and Rocker Mechanism

2021· article· en· W3132078125 on OpenAlexaff
Lei Zhang, Tianyi Zhang, Xuguang Wang, Xingtian Yao, Dan Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobot handHumanoid robotMechanism (biology)SliderRobotComputer scienceSimulationPower (physics)SimplicityArtificial intelligenceComputer visionEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In modern times, humanoid dexterous hands have been developed to a high level. However, they are often complicated or have high cost. A three-fingered robot hand is proposed and developed in this paper for simplicity. For each finger, the structure is designed based on the slider and rocker mechanism to increase the driving power. The new robot hand also has the advantage of easy assembly and low cost. The mechanics analysis is done on the fingers to verify the reason why driving power is increased. Experiments show that the new robot hand can perform the precision grasping and envelop grasping on the objects with suitable shape and size. The experiments of grasping different mass objects show that the new robot hand has more power than our old robot hand. These advantages show the new robot hand would be more useful in practical situation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobot Manipulation and LearningFrench-language works237,207