MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3132163076 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10500185.1

Mapping Belowground Carbon Pools and Potential Vulnerability in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska

2018· article· en· W3132163076 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ann McElvein, S. Ludwig, Greg Fiske, Susan M. Natali, P. J. Mann, Sierra Melton, Jonathan Sanderman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostEnvironmental scienceSoil carbonWetlandSoil organic matterPeatCarbon fibersDeltaGreenhouse gasHydrology (agriculture)Total organic carbonPhysical geographyAtmospheric sciencesSoil scienceEnvironmental chemistrySoil waterEcologyGeographyGeologyChemistryOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Permafrost regions store an estimated half of the global belowground organic carbon pool and twice the global atmospheric carbon level. A warming climate results in increased carbon gas emission, therefore knowing more about the amount and composition of organic carbon stored in permafrost regions is crucial for understanding feedbacks on global climate change. Using the Yukon-Kukskowim (YK) Delta, Alaska as a study site, we quantified belowground carbon pools and their potential vulnerability to release into the atmosphere as greenhouse gasses. We identified relevant landcover classes (burned and unburned upland peat plateaus, wetlands, ponds/lakes) in the YK Delta, from which we quantified total belowground carbon pools (30cm) and assessed the composition of the organic matter using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. To characterize the size and distribution of soil carbon pools in the YK Delta, we built a Random Forest Machine Learning model that mapped the spatial distribution of soil carbon to a depth of 30 cm over a 1910 km2 watershed. The map product was produced in Google Earth Engine and used covariates that include, but are not limited to, Worldview2 high-resolution optical imagery (2m), ArcticDEM (5m), and Sentinel-2 level 1C multispectral imagery (10 m), including NDVI. We found substantial variation across landcover classes in soil characteristics that affect organic matter vulnerability, including gravimetric water content, thaw depth, bulk density, and percent carbon. Compared to upland areas, thaw depths were significantly deeper in wetlands and lakes, where we detected no surface permafrost (to 1m). Soil carbon content (%) was greatest in moss-dominated wetlands; however, these areas also had the lowest bulk density. Carbon pools and organic matter characteristics also varied between burned and unburned areas. Therefore, we expect that carbon vulnerability varies by landcover class and that future carbon emissions are driven by total carbon pools, thaw depths, and composition of the carbon stored in organic matter pools. These carbon pool and vulnerability maps will contribute to better understanding the impacts of subarctic warming and are critical for developing a more accurate assessment of carbon cycling feedbacks from permafrost regions on global climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→