Impact of the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring profile on cognitive and imaging findings of cerebral small-vessel disease in older adults with cognitive complaints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) profiles and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of cerebral small-vessel disease (cSVD) in older adults with cognitive complaints who were grouped as follows: subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia of Alzheimer's type. Group comparisons and correlation analyses among demographic characteristics, cognitive and MRI findings, and ABPM profiles were performed. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analyses for dependent variables of (1) dementia or not and (2) MRI criteria of subcortical vascular dementia (SVaD) or not were conducted with independent variables of dichotomized ABPM profiles. A total of 174 subjects (55 males and 119 females) were included: mean age 75.36 ± 7.13 years; Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 20.51 ± 6.23. No MRI and ABPM findings except medial temporal atrophy were different between three groups. Twenty-four-hour systolic BP (sBP) was correlated with MMSE score (r = -0.182; p = 0.022) and the severity of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) (r = 0.157; p = 0.048). A higher daytime sBP was associated with dementia (odds ratio (OR): 3.734; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.041-13.390; p = 0.043) and MRI finding of SVaD (OR: 10.543; 95% CI: 1.161-95.740; p = 0.036). Although there were no differences in ABPM profiles between three groups, a higher BP-especially a higher sBP-correlated with cognitive dysfunction and severity of WMH in older adults. Only higher daytime sBP was an independent predictor for dementia and MRI findings of SVaD. Among various ABPM profiles in this study, a higher BP, especially a higher sBP, may be considered the most important for clinical and MRI findings of cSVD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".