MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3132426811 · doi:10.1007/s40262-020-00956-1

Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics and Exposure–Response Relationship of Dapagliflozin in Patients without Diabetes and with Chronic Kidney Disease

2021· article· en· W3132426811 on OpenAlexaff
Annemarie B. van der Aart‐van der Beek, Jeroen V. Koomen, Claire C. J. Dekkers, Sean J. Barbour, David W. Boulton, Ron T. Gansevoort, Peter J. Greasley, Abdul Halim Abdul Gafor, Gozewijn D. Laverman, Qiang Li, Soo Kun Lim, Jasper Stevens, Marc Vervloet, Sunita Singh, Daniel C. Cattran, Heather N. Reich, David Z.I. Cherney, Hiddo J.L. Heerspink

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Pharmacokinetics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversitair Medisch Centrum GroningenNovo Nordisk FondenAstraZeneca
KeywordsDapagliflozinRenal functionMedicineKidney diseaseDiabetes mellitusUrologyPharmacokineticsConfidence intervalInternal medicineType 2 diabetesProteinuriaCreatinineVolume of distributionEndocrinologyKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitor, was originally developed as an oral glucose-lowering drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Emerging data suggest that cardiovascular and kidney benefits extend to patients without diabetes. Limited pharmacological data are, however, available in patients without diabetes. We aimed to characterise the pharmacokinetic profile of dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease without type 2 diabetes. Plasma samples were collected in a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial (DIAMOND, NCT03190694, n = 53) that assessed the effects of 10 mg of dapagliflozin in patients with a glomerular filtration rate ≥ 25 mL/min/1.73 m2 and proteinuria > 500 mg/day. Mixed-effects models were used to develop a pharmacokinetic model and to evaluate the association between plasma exposure and response. Plasma concentrations (n = 430 observations) from 48 patients (mean age 50.8 years, mean glomerular filtration rate 57.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, median proteinuria 1115 mg/24 h) were best described using a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. Apparent clearance and volume of distribution were 11.7 (95% confidence interval 10.7–12.7) L/h and 44.9 (95% confidence interval 39.0–50.9) L, respectively. Median dapagliflozin plasma exposure was 740.9 ng h/mL (2.5th–97.5th percentiles: 434.0–1615.3). Plasma exposure increased with decreasing kidney function. Every 100-ng h/mL increment in dapagliflozin plasma exposure was associated with a decrease in the urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (β = − 2.8%, p = 0.01), glomerular filtration rate (β = − 0.5 mL/min/1.73 m2, p < 0.01) and systolic blood pressure (β = − 0.4 mmHg, p = 0.03). The dapagliflozin plasma concentration–time profile in patients with non-diabetic kidney disease appears similar to the profile of patients with diabetic kidney disease described in the literature. Furthermore, the plasma exposure was associated with changes in risk markers for kidney disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical PharmacokineticsSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207