Autoimmune Encephalitis in Children: From Suspicion to Diagnosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are several well-described and studied autoimmune diseases that affect different organ systems, and a limited number of these affect the central nervous system. Autoimmune encephalitis represents a disease with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations and different levels of severity, from mild cognitive impairment to complex encephalopathy. Immune-mediated encephalitis refers to a diverse and rare group of conditions in children associated with nonspecific symptomatology, altered mental state, and recalcitrant seizures. Infectious etiology must be excluded. Immune-mediated encephalitis syndromes could be associated with paraneoplastic or primarily autoimmune mechanisms. The newest scientific advantages have concluded that autoimmune encephalitis may be further divided into different groups of diseases depending on the immune response; examples are antibodies to cell surface proteins, antibodies to intracellular synaptic proteins, T-cell response with antibodies to intracellular antigens, among others. Treatment consists of supportive therapy, ranging from supplemental oxygen, fluid restriction to mechanical circulatory support. Specific treatment includes immunoglobulin infusion, plasmapheresis, and pulse steroid treatment. Prognosis is poor if specific treatment is not timely instituted. The diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis could be challenging to clinicians due to its diverse clinical features, which can mimic a variety of other pathologic processes. Screening for cancer and proper management that includes immune therapy are fundamental, although some patients will need immune suppression for weeks or months as autoimmune encephalitis may relapse; therefore, follow-up is always necessary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".