Abstract PD2-04: Updated overall survival (OS) results from the phase III MONALEESA-7 trial of pre- or perimenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with endocrine therapy (ET) ± ribociclib
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: MONALEESA-7 (NCT02278120), the first large randomized phase III clinical trial dedicated to investigating a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) plus ET vs ET + placebo (PBO) in pre- or perimenopausal patients with HR+/HER2− ABC, previously demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS with the addition of ribociclib (RIB) to ET vs PBO + ET (median, not reached vs 40.9 months; HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.54-0.95]; P = .00973; Im SA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019). This concluded the protocol-defined final analysis of OS and the patients and investigators were unblinded to their treatment assignment allowing patients on the PBO arm to cross-over to RIB treatment. Longer follow-up allows for more events to further characterize the long-term survival benefits. Here we report an exploratory update of OS after a minimum of ~ four years of follow-up, an additional 20 months since the last report. Methods: Pre- or perimenopausal patients with HR+/HER2− ABC were randomized 1:1 to receive RIB or PBO plus goserelin with either a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI; letrozole or anastrozole) or tamoxifen. RIB is approved in combination with an NSAI in pre- or perimenopausal patients. Patients who had received a prior CDK4/6i or ET in the advanced setting were excluded. Patients who received ET in the (neo)adjuvant setting or ≤ 1 prior line of chemotherapy for advanced disease were eligible to enroll. Updated OS were evaluated by Cox proportional hazards model and summarized using Kaplan-Meier methods. Additional post-progression endpoints such as progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), time to chemotherapy (CT) and CT-free survival were also evaluated and summarized. Results: The data cutoff for this updated OS analysis was 29 June 2020, and the median follow-up was 53.5 mo (min, 46.9 mo). These updated results with extended follow-up demonstrated an OS benefit with RIB + ET vs PBO + ET (median, 58.7 vs 48.0 mo; HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.61-0.96]). In patients receiving an NSAI, a similar OS benefit was observed with RIB + NSAI vs PBO + NSAI (median, 58.7 vs 47.7 mo; HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.62-1.04]). The survival benefit shown in subgroup analyses was consistent with the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. PFS2, time to chemotherapy (CT), and CT-free survival for the ITT and NSAI populations are in the Table. Among the patients who discontinued study treatment, 77.3% and 78.1% in the RIB + ET vs PBO + ET arms received a subsequent antineoplastic therapy, respectively, and 12.9% and 26.1% received a subsequent line of CDK4/6i. Additionally there were 15 patients in the PBO arm that crossed over to the RIB arm following unblinding and prior to disease progression. Conclusions: With an extended follow-up of more than 4 years, RIB + ET continued to demonstrate a clinically relevant OS benefit compared with ET alone in pre- or perimenopausal patients with a median OS ~5 years with RIB +ET in HR+/HER2− ABC. A similar benefit with RIB was observed for PFS2, time to CT, and CT-free survival. ITTNSAI cohortRIB + ETn=335PBO + ETn=337RIB + NSAIn=248PBO + NSAIn=247PFS2Events, n (%)177 (52.8)221 (65.6)131 (52.8)159 (64.4)Median, mo44.231.043.630.4HR (95% CI)0.68 (0.56-0.83)0.69 (0.55-0.87)Time to first CTEvents, n (%)144 (43.0)173 (51.3)107 (43.1)129 (52.2)Median, mo50.936.850.936.0ITT HR(95% CI)0.69 (0.56-0.87)0.66 (0.51-0.85)CT-free survivalEvents, n (%)190 (56.7)236 (70.0)139 (56.0)169 (68.4)Median, mo42.426.442.525.9HR (95% CI)0.67 (0.55-0.81)0.64 (0.51-0.81) Citation Format: Debu Tripathy, Seock-Ah Im, Marco Colleoni, Fabio Franke, Aditya Bardia, Nadia Harbeck, Sara Hurvitz, Louis Chow, Joohyuk Sohn, Keun Seok Lee, Saul Campos-Gomez, Rafael Villanueva Vazquez, Kyung Hae Jung, K Govind Babu, Paul Wheatley-Price, Michelino De Laurentiis, Young-Hyuck Im, Sherko Kümmel, Nagi El-Saghir, Mei-Ching Liu, Sharonjeet Kaur, Claudia Gasch, Craig Wang, Yongyu Wang, Arunava Chakravartty, Yen-Shen Lu. Updated overall survival (OS) results from the phase III MONALEESA-7 trial of pre- or perimenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with endocrine therapy (ET) ± ribociclib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-04.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".