Physical-Layer Security for Cognitive Radio Networks over Cascaded Rayleigh Fading Channels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, physical-layer security (PLS) for an underlay cognitive radio network (CRN) over cascaded Rayleigh fading channels is studied. The underlying cognitive radio system consists of a secondary source transmitting to a destination over a cascaded Rayleigh fading channel. An eavesdropper is attempting to intercept the confidential information of the secondary users (SUs) pair. The secrecy is studied in terms of three main security metrics, which are the secrecy outage probability (SOP), the probability of non-zero secrecy capacity (Prnzc), and the intercept probability (Pint). The effects of the path loss and the variation of the distances from the SU transmitter over the secrecy are also analyzed. Results reveal the great effect of the cascade level over the system secrecy. In addition, the effect of varying the interference threshold that the PU receiver can tolerate over the secrecy of the SUs pair is studied. The effect of the channel model parameters of both the main and the wiretap channels is investigated using both simulation and analytical results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".