MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3132746106 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11434

Multi-Scale Failure Analysis of Laminated Composites Using the Boundary Element Method

2016· dissertation· en· W3132746106 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
René Quispe Rodríguez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoundary element methodFourier seriesBoundary value problemReciprocity (cultural anthropology)Fourier transformMathematicsFinite element methodMathematical analysisStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project has as its main objective the development of the computational tools capable of facilitating multi-scale failure analysis in laminated composites. First, for the continuum meso-scale, the boundary element method (BEM) is used, in which the anisotropic 3D fundamental solutions based on double Fourier series were employed. The most significant advantage of using this Fourier series representation and its derivatives is that Fourier coefficients need to be evaluated just one time independent of the number of field points. This fact reduced the computational efforts, besides facilitating the ease of implementation into a BEM code. The dynamic effects in the continuum media were included in the equilibrium equation. These effects induced domain integrals in the boundary integral equation (BIE). The Dual Reciprocity Method (DRM) and the Radial Integration Method (RIM) were implemented for the transformation of the domain integrals into boundary integrals. Additionally, an acceleration technique namely the Adaptive Cross Approximation (ACA) was used with the BEM. The combination of the 3D anisotropic fundamental solutions with ACA resulted in a substantial memory and processing speed gain, that is of main importance when huge numerical problems, such as multi-scale problems, are being analized. Next, the failure multi-scale criterion was implemented and applied to laminated composites. For the micro-scale analysis, a specific potential for epoxy materials was used. Then, the Cauchy-Born rule was used to couple the scales on the 3D multi-scale model. Some numerical examples were presented in order to show the validity of the failure criterion. The project involved a one-year period at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Choon-Lai Tan, specialist in fracture mechanics, anisotropic material formulation and boundary elements. This period in Canada provided the student with a strong academic formation, besides, providing the possibility of obtaining a double diploma. Through a cotutelle agreement, the student will receive a Ph.D. degree from Carleton University as well as from UNICAMP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNumerical methods in engineeringFrench-language works237,207