Tin Halide Perovskites Going Forward: Frost Diagrams Offer Hints
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lead (Pb) in conventional perovskite solar cells (PSCs) is toxic and has to be replaced. Situated in one group of the periodic table of elements, tin (Sn) has the same valence electrons’ configuration as Pb (ns2np2), promising analogous chemical properties. Hence, Sn is considered a suitable replacement to Pb. However, because of the lack of lanthanide shrinkage, Sn behaves differently: Pb is stable in Pb2+ form, an oxidation state needed for perovskite structure, while Sn tends to lose all its valence electrons forming Sn4+. As a result, PSCs based on Sn are not efficient. Traces of oxygen have been conventionally discussed as a source of Sn oxidation. But recent findings point to the oxidation of Sn-based perovskites even in the absence of oxygen. This perspective summarizes recently-discovered unconventional oxidation pathways of Sn perovskites, including reaction with solvent molecules and disproportionation. We explain these phenomena by a Frost–Ebsworth diagram and argue that a deeper understanding of this diagram is a key toward stable and efficient Pb-free Sn-based PSCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it